Thursday, December 13, 2012

Jackie Chan suggests HK protests should be restricted: Report


//In my mind, Jackie Chan is a guy who made his money jumping hoops and across staircases like an ape, and worthy only for cheap flicks. He has in recent years directed his own movies, ensuring that he always comes out as hero, and comfortably ensconced between a pair of breasts or two. 

Like his cheap flicks, he has no backbone, preferring to toe the line with the Mainland.

In short, he is a sickening old monkey who is better off in the trashbin of history than in the forefront of change.




Jackie Chan suggests HK protests should be restricted: Report
Updated 06:19 PM Dec 13, 2012
HONG KONG - Jackie Chan suggested in a recent interview that protests should be restricted in the freewheeling Chinese city of Hong Kong.

The action star lamented that Hong Kong has become a city of protests, where people "scold China, scold the leaders, scold anything, protest against anything.

"There should be regulations on what can and cannot be protested," Chan told the Southern People Weekly, which published his comments yesterday. He didn't say what kinds of protests he thought should be restricted.

The star of movies such as "Rush Hour" and "Rumble in the Bronx" triggered a backlash three years ago with similar comments on the need to restrict freedom in his hometown.

A former British colony, Hong Kong was returned to China in 1997 and is now a semiautonomous region. Residents are fiercely proud of the Western-style civil liberties they enjoy that are not seen on the mainland, including the freedom to demonstrate.

The city has been the scene lately of a rising number of protests by people upset with their Beijing-backed leader, Mr Leung Chun-ying, a lack of full democracy and worries about Beijing's growing influence on the city.

Tens of thousands of people took to the streets in July to protest after Mr Leung took office.

In 2009, Mr Chan sparked outrage among lawmakers in Hong Kong when said he said, "I'm not sure if it's good to have freedom or not." He also said he was "beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled."

A representative for Mr Chan did not respond to request for comment.

Southern People Weekly is part of a media group controlled by southern Guangdong province's Communist Party and known for its lively reporting. AP

Monday, December 10, 2012

Is Singapore becoming anti-women?


//A third rate "independent news" website made up of a single singapore based journalist begging for attention. 

I can only guess the woman journalist here doesn't like those girls in the picture. The truth is that she is no different and is as sexist as the men are in Saudi Arabia.



http://www.bikyamasr.com

Is Singapore becoming anti-women?
Mariam Yuan | 9 December 2012 | 0 Comments



Is this the future of Singapore’s women?

SINGAPORE: For the past few months, we have been reporting regularly on women’s rights issues, doing the best to not trivialize or sexualize women in Singapore. But continued articles published by English and Chinese language websites have continued to confound the issue.

Most recently, an article by AsiaOne.com showed how high-end restaurants, clubs and other establishments are hiring “attractive” women in the city to wear little clothes in an effort to entice customers to come by.

Short skirts, lingerie-clad hostesses are now such a commonplace in the city that few think twice about seeing a little – or a lot – of leg.

But I wonder, as a journalist, if we are doing enough to ensure that women’s voices are heard in this city and across Southeast Asia. As an Asian woman, I feel that the rise of the porn industry and the overly sexual nature of women’s reporting has left us cold to the stark realities facing us women in the is part of the world.

We are often seen and written about as submissive sexual characters who want to please men. It would appear, from the articles written about women that here in Singapore, the young women on the pages of magazines, at clubs and in the business sector, use their bodies for personal gains.

At the same time there is a failure on journalists’ part to adequately report on the positives that women are contributing to society. There are a large number of female executives here who do not resort to sex to get ahead. They are the true heroes of our supposedly progressive society. But they are left aside, in favor of the bikini, or less, adorned woman.

It is a frustrating time to live in Asia as an Asian woman. The media sees our vagina as a means of reporting. What we do with our bodies seems to always be up for discussion. In effect, it is our body that gets the attention.

When we face sexual violence, too often the media views this as a positive for the men. Women are not getting a fair shake in this regard. The media push a stereotype that views women as sex objects, for men’s pleasure and gazing. It is time to change this perspective.

If a woman has had sex, that’s great, it’s her life, but for the media to continually approach the topic of women’s issues in a manner that disregards the woman and focuses only on what she has done with her body, this begs the question: is Singapore becoming anti-women?

BM

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Put public's interests first in transport fare review: WP

//Stupidity is the order of the day. Enjoy!



Put public's interests first in transport fare review: WP
Posted: 09 December 2012 1621 hrs



SINGAPORE: The Workers' Party (WP) has urged the government and public transport operators to put the interests of the public first before shareholders' interests.

It said that with Singapore facing a slowing economy, coupled with inflation, any hike in bus fares will only add to the hardship of many middle- and low-income Singaporeans.

It also asked the government to fund more generous public transport concessions for senior citizens and introduce fare concessions for people with disabilities.

The party said this in a statement on Sunday, in response to a signal from Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew on December 6 that bus fares may be increased to improve the pay of bus drivers in Singapore.

WP said it is unfortunate that Mr Lui made this suggestion so soon after the SMRT bus drivers' strike over pay and living conditions on November 26 and 27.

It said any decisions on fare increases should be made only after a period of review and adequate debate.

The party said it recognises that bus drivers need to be paid more and that bus companies need to attract more Singaporeans.

However, it said, the government should not assume nor suggest that this cost increase must automatically be borne by commuters.

WP pointed out that the two public transport operators remain very profitable.

It added that commuters should not be expected to pay higher fares, especially when service standards remain unsatisfactory.

- CNA/xq

Why not delist SMRT?


//When such a question pops up in Singapore's most read English newspaper, one realises that despite the high GDP, there are significant sections of people who are well educated, but not up to scratch in their understanding of economics. How does a government deal with this? And if such issues exist in Singapore, how far worse they will be in every single other country on earth?



Why not delist SMRT?
From Chua Soo Kiat
Updated 05:36 PM Dec 09, 2012
I refer to Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew's comment that an increase in bus drivers' salaries would have to be taken into account when adjusting fares ("Bus drivers' salaries have to go up: Transport Minister", Dec 7).

Why should the transport operators continue to be listed entities, allowing private equity owners of SMRT to benefit from the provision of an essential service?

By delisting the company, SMRT would free up badly-needed capital to better pay those who matter most to the company and Singapore - the drivers and engineers. And SMRT would not need to peg their top management's pay to that of other listed companies.

SMRT would also be free of the compliance burden that comes along with a listing on the Singapore Exchange, which could mean substantial savings. It also would not have to pay dividends.

The Transport Minister also needs to be mindful of any impact the fare increase would have on persistent inflation in Singapore.

UN conference adopts extension of Kyoto climate accord



//this looks like the formation of a model - certain countries that support low lying islands will certainly draw the benefits from those countries vs those who did not help. Would it be possible for industrialized countries to 'adopt' others in need?




Doha: climate change talks end with compensation deal for poor nations that could cost billions
Britain faces paying billions of pounds in compensation to less developed countries as part of a new international deal on climate change.


By Louise Gray, Doha and Richard Gray, Science Correspondent

8:00PM GMT 08 Dec 2012


The agreement, which was thrashed out in an extra day of talks at the United National climate change summit in Qatar, will mean rich nations having to compensate poorer ones for losses they suffer due to global warming.


Angry exchanges between delegations over the measure brought threats of walkouts and even tears from small island states, which pushed to have the new mechanism introduced despite fierce opposition from the United States.


Although it is not due to come into force for at least a year, the agreement could cost wealthy nations such as the UK billions of pounds.


It comes as economists warned that commitments to cut carbon emissions – agreed earlier in the talks as part of negotiations carried out by the European Union as a whole – could cost the British economy around £23 billion by 2020.

Other major economies such as the USA, China and Japan refused to sign up to similar commitments, leaving businesses in the UK and other European countries at a competitive disadvantage.

The UK has also pledged to provide £2.9 billion in aid to developing countries to help them adopt green technology and cope with the consequences of climate change.

The new agreement on compensation is likely to be paid on top of that to help "vulnerable" countries pay for "loss and damage" caused by sea level rise, extreme weather and other impacts driven by global warming.

A coalition of 43 small islands and low lying coastal countries, including the Maldives, Mauritius, Seychelles, Cuba, Bahamas and Fiji, pushed for the measure, stating they faced an onslaught of drought, floods and famines, and so needed help to cope with the harm.

They argued that under the principle where the polluter is made to pay for harm to the environment, richer developed nations – which are responsible for the bulk of greenhouse gas emissions – should provide financial and technological help to those countries most at risk.

They said the fund could act as a kind of insurance system to help small islands that are likely to suffer most from climate change.

Ed Davey, the climate change and energy secretary, who is leading the UK delegation, said the UK had backed putting a reference to loss and damage into the agreement and was in favour of stronger targets on climate change.

There were cheers around the Qatar National Convention Centre in Doha yesterday when the final text of the agreement setting out the plan to introduce the compensation measures was passed despite objections from Russia and the USA.

Ed Davey, the climate change secretary, said poor countries were already dealing with rising sea levels and the seepage of salt into water supplies - and rich countries like the UK had a duty to help by developing a loss and damage mechanism.

"I do think we have a duty to help people who are losing their countries below the waves," he said.

Mr Davey said recent floods in Britain showed how important it was to deal with floods.

"The UK is already spending hundreds of millions on flood defences as we see more flooding – which many scientists say is attributable to climate change. There are poor countries that also need support in that.

"We will look at that issue and consider it with others. There is an important debate to be had and the text that has been put forward – whilst not absolutely specific – ensures we look at this seriously in the international community."

The exact details of the loss and damage scheme, including how much developed countries will have to pay, are expected to be worked out at future meetings of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, next year or in 2014.

Malia Talakai, the deputy lead negotiator for the Alliance of Small Island States, said: "Both the fund and insurance premiums would be supported by contributions from industrialised countries based on their responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions and ability to pay for its consequences.

"At the present time, developing countries are left to cover the costs of loss and damage from climate impacts that are not of their making."

Kieren Keke, Nauru Foreign Minister, who led the Alliance of Small Island States, said his people's lives are in danger.

In a moving speech which he was cheered by many at the meeting, he said ambitions on cutting carbon and providing finance to vulnerable countries remained too low.

"Those who are indifferent need to open their eyes. Those who are obstructive and self-serving need to realise we are not talking about how comfortably your people live but whether our people live."

Earlier the UK was among 38 industrialised countries to sign up to an extension of the Kyoto Protocol, the only binding pact on cutting green house gas emissions. The deal extends the life of the commitment past 2012, when it was due to end, until 2020.

However major polluters including China, USA, Canada, Russia and Japan did not sign up to the pact.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, which was agreed in 1997 and came into force in 2005, the UK was committed to reduce its emissions by around 34 per cent as part of the 20 per cent reduction target agreed by negotiators for the whole of the European Union.

The extended commitment contains a clause that could lead to the EU commitment expanding, to result in a 30 per cent reduction target, something that British officials say could increase the UK's own liability to a 42 per cent reduction.

Economists estimate this could cost the UK economy around £23 billion by 2020.

David Cameron, the Prime Minister, is likely to face heavy criticism from his backbenches if Britain is left facing expensive carbon cutting targets that are not being matched by industrial competitors.

More than 100 Conservative MPs – including several within the Cabinet – are said to be climate change sceptics.

Clacton MP Douglas Carswell, one of the leading Conservative climate-change sceptics, said: "Britain should have absolutely no part in this. The whole science of climate change is highly questionable. By pursuing new emissions targets we are only accelerating a process of deindustrialisation in Europe, which is transporting manufacturing jobs to other countries.

"The United States was right to oppose this. We would be doing the same if we had democratically accountable people negotiating on our behalf. But we have European Union officials negotiating on our behalf who are immune to the ballot box."

After 12 days of deadlocked talks, delegates finally agreed on a framework that will help to form the basis of a new binding deal on climate change to be negotiated in 2015 in time to replace the Kyoto Protocol in 2020.

Environmental groups, however, have expressed frustration at the protracted process and lack of progress that has been made in successive climate change talks, which are now in their 18th year.

One of the main aims throughout has been limiting global temperature rises, which have been attributed to growing levels of greenhouse gases - primarily carbon dioxide - in the atmosphere. A key objective has been to limit global average temperature rises to a maximum of 2C.

There are more than 17,000 delegates attending the talks in the desert in Doha. It is estimated that the talks themselves have had a carbon footprint of more than 40,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide – equivalent to cutting down 64 hectares of rainforest.

The Swarovski chandeliers in the main meeting hall and a skyline of sky scrapers, with delegates ferried around in limousines, have made a surreal setting for the talks. Qatar, one of the world's richest nations, but with plentiful supplies of cheap energy from its oil, has the largest carbon footprint per person in the world.

There was disappointment that the hosts had failed to build any momentum for cutting emissions in the Middle East.

Negotiations ran through Friday night and into yesterday, with one delegate from the Philippines bursting into tears at one point.

The tense talks finally ended without any firm commitments on reducing carbon emissions nor on climate change aid, another key topic under discussion at the summit.

Richard Gledhill a climate change adviser with Price Waterhouse Cooper business consultants, said however that the agreement to address the loss and damage suffered by developing nations marked a significant victory for the countries which are most at risk of the impacts of global warming.

He said: "With concern growing that the two degree target could soon be out of reach, this issue can only grow in importance.

"The issue of loss and damage is closely tied in with the issue of legal liability. Some lawyers expect climate change to unleash a flood of liability claims."

Nick Mabey, the director of sustainable development campaign group E3G, said negotiations have been badly managed in Doha.

But with a global deal again on the table, the world is finally moving on after the failure of governments to reach a binding agreement to succeed the Kyoto Protocol at the UN climate change talks in Copenhagen in 2009, he said.

"We have cleared up the legacy of Copenhagen now we can focus on a comprehensive agreement in 2015 that decides whether we will face a 2C or a 5C rise in temperature in future."

Additional reporting: Rob Watts

Saturday, December 8, 2012

Canada Approves Both Cnooc-Nexen, Petronas-Progress Deals


//that was an awful mistake by Canada 


Canada Approves Both Cnooc-Nexen, Petronas-Progress Deals

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper approved Cnooc Ltd. (883)'s $15.1 billion takeover of Nexen Inc. (NXY) and Petroliam Nasional Bhd.'s C$5.2 billion ($5.2 billion) takeover of Progress Energy Resources Corp. (PRQ)

The deal by Beijing-based Cnooc is the largest ever takeover by a Chinese company, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It gives the state-owned company a stake in Canada's largest oil-sands project and the biggest position in the Buzzard oil field in the U.K. North Sea.

China is securing global reserves to feed demand in the the world's second-largest economy, which accounted for half of the world's oil consumption growth in 2011, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Harper, who has touted Canada as an emerging "energy superpower," has called it a national priority to diversify energy exports, sending less to the U.S. and more to Asia.

"It's important to have clarity on this, not just for Canada's foreign relations with certain super-power nations but also to ensure timely development of these very important resources," said Robert G. Gill, portfolio manager at Toronto- based Aston Hill Financial, which has more than C$6 billion assets under management.

Tested Ability

The two bids tested Harper's ability to balance the need to bolster economic relations with Asian economies without letting them gain too much influence over the world's third-largest pool of oil reserves. While allowing the deals, he also said Canada won't approve state-owned companies taking controlling interests in any more oil-sands projects, except in "exceptional circumstances."

"These were difficult decisions" that reflect "the broad views of Canadians," Harper told reporters.

"From a perspective of industry this is the perfect solution," said John Stephenson, who helps manage C$2.7 billion at First Asset Management Inc. in a phone interview from Toronto. "You get the benefit of patient capital servicing value for investors and you don't give up control, which is really the issue most Canadians feel passionately about."

Shares of Calgary-based Nexen rallied 15 percent to $26.94 as of 6:19 p.m. New York time in trading after U.S. exchanges closed, 2 percent below Cnooc's $27.50 offer. The Canadian dollar strengthened, rising 0.3 percent to 98.84 cents per U.S. dollar as the announcements were made.

Biggest Transaction

The Cnooc-Nexen transaction is the biggest in Canada since Calgary-based Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) bought Petro-Canada in August 2009 for about $18 billion. Through its C$2.1 billion acquisition of Opti Canada Ltd. last year, Cnooc already owns 35 percent of the Long Lake oil-sands project operated by Nexen. It would gain Nexen's 20 percent interest in the Usan offshore Nigerian project operated by a unit of Total SA.

Progress shares, which surged 74 percent on the day the first bid by Petronas was announced June 28, closed at C$19.35 in Toronto. Petronas offered C$22 a share.

"We're obviously quite pleased with the decision," said Michael Culbert, chief executive officer of Calgary-based Progress, by phone. "We know that this has been a difficult decision to make and we don't take that lightly."

An e-mail seeking comment sent to Peter Hunt, a spokesman for Cnooc in Calgary, was not immediately returned. Patti Lewis, a Nexen spokeswoman in Calgary, did not immediately return phone and e-mail messages seeking comment. Azman Ibrahim, a spokesman for Petronas, did not immediately return an e-mail message seeking comment and could not be reached before regular business hours in Kuala Lumpur.

Petronas Acquisition

The acquisition of Progress by Petronas gives the Malaysian state-owned company gas reserves to build a liquefied natural gas export facility along the British Columbia coast that would cost C$9 billion to C$11 billion, the companies said this week.

Petronas has the world's largest LNG-producing site in Sarawak, Malaysia, according to its website, and also operates the world's largest LNG carrier fleet.

The Canadian decisions came on the same day Glencore International Plc (GLEN)'s C$6.1 billion takeover of Viterra Inc. (VT), Canada's largest grain handler, received Chinese regulatory approval.

Investment by Chinese state-owned companies in Canada's energy industry has become a contentious issue, and the deals represent the end of a trend of state-owned companies buying Canadian oil-sands firms, not the beginning, Harper said.

Further Control

Harper said further "foreign state control of oil sands development" would no longer be a net benefit to Canada, which relies on exports for one-third of economic output and counts on energy products for almost one-quarter of those shipments.

Fifty-eight percent of Canadians wanted the government to block the Nexen takeover, according to an online poll of 1,000 people taken Oct. 10 to Oct. 11 by Angus Reid Public Opinion.

The opposition New Democratic Party called the Cnooc approval "irresponsible" because most Canadians oppose the purchase. "This is a farce," Peter Julian, the NDP's spokesman on natural resources, said in a statement. "While Conservatives admit that under the new rules this transaction is not a net benefit to Canadians, they have approved it anyway."

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver has said the country's biggest resource projects will require nearly C$650 billion of investment to develop over the next decade.

Review Thresholds

Harper said Canada will raise the threshold for foreign- takeover reviews by private investors to C$1 billion in enterprise value as earlier planned, while the existing threshold of C$330 million in asset value will continue to apply to state-owned enterprises. Industry Minister Christian Paradis will also have the ability to extend the review period to take national security reviews into account, Harper said.

Foreign state-owned businesses will still be welcome to acquire minority stakes and enter into joint ventures with Canadian businesses, Harper said.

Cnooc, which said it received approval from the European Union today on the deal, has not said whether U.S. authorities have approved its takeover of Nexen's assets in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, where the Calgary company gets eight percent of its production.

Natalie Earnest, a spokeswoman at the U.S. Department of the Treasury that oversees the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., declined to comment in an e-mail, citing confidentiality rules.

Cnooc had already made several commitments to Canada to win support for the Nexen sale. These include listing its shares (NXY) on the Toronto Stock Exchange (SPTSX), establishing Calgary as its base for North and Central America and maintaining Nexen's employment levels and capital spending program.

Cnooc accepted management and employment conditions set by the Canadian government, two people familiar with the matter said Nov. 20.

The approval of the Petronas bid came after Paradis blocked the bid on Oct. 19 and gave the companies 30 days to make additional concessions.

To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Mayeda in Ottawa at amayeda@bloomberg.net; Greg Quinn in Ottawa at gquinn1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Scanlan at dscanlan@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPad: http://m.bloomberg.com/ipad/


Sent from my iPad

Friday, December 7, 2012

At Least One Mac to Be Made in USA: CEO Cook


// it might be taken literally..!

CNBC.com Article: At Least One Mac to Be Made in USA: CEO Cook
Apple CEO Tim Cook told NBC News that it would soon bring production for one of its several Mac lines to the USA.
Full Story:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100285142
------------------------------------------------
Download CNBC Real-Time from the App Store for Free and get Streaming Real-Time quotes, personalizable watchlists, breaking news and the latest videos from CNBC.
iPad users: http://m.cnbc.com/ipad
iPhone users: http://www.itunes.com/apps/cnbcreal-time


Sent from my iPad

Dan Gertler Earns Billions as Mine Deals Leave Congo Poorest Nation

//not a recommended way to live life..



Dan Gertler Earns Billions as Mine Deals Leave Congo Poorest Nation

Dan Gertler's bearded face lights up as he looks out the helicopter window. Below, an installation twice the size of Monaco rises from a clearing in the central African forest, where it transforms ore mined from the ochre earth into sheets of copper.

"Look at it, look at it," the Israeli billionaire, 38, shouts through the headset above the thrum of rotors. "This is what life is all about," Gertler says as the chopper lands in the scorching, dry afternoon heat of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

"Everyone comes with dreams and illusions and promises. Everyone wants quick deals. They don't want to invest. We are real."

Wearing a black suit by French fashion house Zilli, ritual white tassels hanging off both hips and a black-velvet yarmulke, Gertler hops out into the dust of Mutanda, a mine controlled by his partner, Glencore International Plc (GLEN), that holds cobalt and some of the highest-grade copper in the world, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its January issue.

More from the January issue of Bloomberg Markets:

  • Jeffrey Gundlach Sees 'Kaboom' Ahead
  • Outlook 2013: A Case for Optimism
  • The World's Most Accurate Forecasters

He climbs into an air-conditioned Toyota Land Cruiser to tour the mine, tapping messages into one of his three BlackBerrys, whose batteries, like those of smartphones and laptops everywhere, often depend on cobalt to keep their charge.

Gertler has stakes in companies that control 9.6 percent of world cobalt production, based on U.S. Geological Survey data and company figures.

Diamonds and Gold

That's just the beginning of Gertler's influence in Congo, the largest country of sub-Saharan Africa, with the world's richest deposits of cobalt and major reserves of copper, diamonds, gold, tin and coltan, an ore containing the metal tantalum, which is used in consumer electronics. His Gibraltar- registered Fleurette Properties Ltd. owns stakes in various Congolese mines through at least 60 holding companies in offshore tax havens such as the British Virgin Islands.

Gertler, whose grandfather co-founded Israel's diamond exchange in 1947, arrived in Congo in 1997 seeking rough diamonds. The 23-year-old trader struck a deep friendship with Joseph Kabila, who then headed the Congolese army and today is the nation's president. Since those early days, Gertler has invested in iron ore, gold, cobalt and copper as well as agriculture, oil and banking. In the process, he's built up a net worth of at least $2.5 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Roster of Critics

He's also acquired a roster of critics. Many of the government's deals with Gertler deprive Congo's 68 million people of badly needed funds, according to the London-based anticorruption group Global Witness and lawmakers from Congo and the U.K., the country's second-biggest aid donor after the U.S.

"Dan Gertler is essentially looting Congo at the expense of its people," says Jean Pierre Muteba, the head of a group of nongovernmental organizations that monitor the mining sector in Katanga province, where most of Congo's copper is located.

"He has political connections, so state companies sell him mines for low prices and he sells them on for huge profits. That's how he's become a billionaire."

In the eight months preceding November 2011 elections, in which Kabila won a second five-year term, companies affiliated with Gertler bought shares in five mining ventures from three state-owned firms, according to minutes of board meetings, company filings and documents published later. The state companies didn't announce the sales.

'Lies Are Screaming'

In at least three of the cases, prices paid were below valuations of the projects made by analysts at Deutsche Bank AG, London-based Numis Securities Ltd. and Oriel Securities Ltd. and Atlanta-based consulting firm Golder Associates Inc.

Gertler denies that he purchased companies at below-market rates or that any of his deals have involved kickbacks.

"The lies are screaming to the heavens," he says in his native Hebrew in a June interview, during three days Bloomberg reporters spent with him in Congo and Israel.

He returns from Congo to his home in Bnei Brak, an ultra- Orthodox suburb of Tel Aviv, each week to spend the Sabbath with his wife, Anat, and their nine children.

Congo has a history of making deals out of the public view. The International Monetary Fund this month halted a $532 million loan program with the country. The IMF said the government didn't adhere to its demand to publish the full details of a 2011 mining deal between a state-owned miner and a company that two people familiar with the matter say is affiliated with Gertler.

Losing Disbursements

Congo will lose out on three loan disbursements worth a total of about $225 million, according to Oscar Melhado, the IMF's resident representative in Congo.

The Washington-based lender already froze payments to Congo in December 2011, because a lack of transparency made it hard to track whether funds from mineral deals were flowing into state coffers, says Antoinette Sayeh, director of the IMF's African Department.

"Given the significance of natural resources in this economy and the huge impact that natural resources can have, we think it's very important to help DRC improve in terms of its governance," she says.

As the country's mineral wealth is developed, the lot of Congo's people isn't improving. Congo remains the world's most- destitute nation, according to the UN Development Programme's measure of health, education and income. Most of the country lives without electricity or running water, and one in five children dies before his or her fifth birthday. Armed groups continue to destabilize the country.

Election Irregularities

Congo's per capita income of just $280, in 2005 dollars, is below what it was in 1960, when the country -- formerly called Zaire -- gained independence from Belgium. The World Bank ranks Congo No. 181 out of 185 in its Ease of Doing Business Index for 2013, down from No. 180 a year earlier.

Kabila's re-election was marred by irregularities and violence, according to observers from Congo's Catholic Church and the European Union. Kabila's opponent, Etienne Tshisekedi, contested the 49 percent-to-32 percent vote, charging it was fraudulent. The Congolese Supreme Court ruled it valid.

In August, U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, wrote to Meg Lundsager, the U.S. representative to the IMF, demanding better oversight of the loan program in Congo. "Billions of dollars of state assets have been transferred for a fraction of their value to nebulous international firms on the IMF's watch," Coburn wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by Bloomberg News. The U.S. gave $268.2 million in aid in 2011.

Glencore's Role

Lawmakers from the U.K. are demanding that aid to Congo be slashed because the country can't show that earnings from its mines are benefiting its people.

Global Witness has called on Glencore and FTSE 100 Index- listed Eurasian Natural Resources Corp., (ENRC) two companies involved in the pre-election deals with Gertler, to publish details of the transactions and dispel the anti-corruption group's suspicions that Congolese officials received kickbacks in return for selling assets to Gertler.

"Offering, paying, authorizing, soliciting or accepting bribes is unacceptable to Glencore," company spokesman Charles Watenphul said in an e-mail. ENRC declined to comment.

Gertler says disclosing the deals to the public is the Congolese government's responsibility, not his. "We're a private company. Why should we announce?" he says.

"I should get a Nobel Prize," adds Gertler, who paces around and waves his arms as his demeanor swings between anger and boyish charm during interviews.

"They need people like us, who come and put billions in the ground. Without this, the resources are worth nothing."

'Braved the Hurricane'

The government insists it's following the rules of the IMF agreement, which calls for it to disclose deals for its natural resources. And Kabila, 41, defends Gertler as a man who staked his fortune on Congo at a time when the country was wracked by war and in desperate need of cash.

"The truth is, during our very difficult times, there were investors who came and left and others who braved the hurricane," he said of Gertler in a brief interview at his riverside palace in December 2011. "He's one of those."

The bond between the two men is so strong that Kabila at times uses Gertler as a special diplomatic envoy, including in 2002, when the Israeli businessman met with then-U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice in Washington to ask for help ending Congo's war with its neighbors.

Secular Upbringing

Diamonds have been a backdrop to Gertler's life since his childhood in affluent northern Tel Aviv, where he had a secular upbringing. His mother ran a pop-music radio station, and his father was a goalkeeper for Maccabi Tel Aviv, a top-division pro soccer team, before becoming a diamond dealer.

As a youth, Gertler got up at 5 a.m. to learn how to polish gems before heading to school. He joined his grandfather, Romanian emigre Moshe Schnitzer, at business meetings to watch him negotiate diamond deals. When Schnitzer died in 2007, Benjamin Netanyahu, who's now Israel's prime minister, gave a eulogy.

Gertler, sitting below a stained-glass dome at his office in one of the Israel Diamond Exchange's four towers in Ramat Gan, just east of Tel Aviv, turns wistful when he talks about Schnitzer. He recalls a business lesson his grandfather imparted: "He told me: 'Dan, you meet your bankers and you ask for credit only when you don't need it. Just to secure it. Because when you need it, it is too late.'"

'Guy Has Guts'

At age 22, Gertler started buying rough diamonds so he could work with larger volumes, he says. Gertler flew between war-torn nations such as Liberia and Angola and the major diamond centers in the U.S., India and Israel, buying and selling gems, he says.

"From the beginning, he went his own way," says his uncle, Shmuel Schnitzer, 63, who was president of the World Federation of Diamond Bourses from 2002 to 2006."The guy has guts. This is the basic thing about him."

Gertler broke with his family's secular tradition when he and Anat decided to adopt an ultra-Orthodox lifestyle. They've banned television and computers from their five-story, terraced house in Bnei Brak, whose crisp stone finishing and verdant shrubbery lining each floor contrast with the neighbors' concrete apartment buildings.

Charitable Giving

Today, Gertler donates to Jewish charities in Israel, including Migdal Ohr, which runs boarding schools for indigent children and orphans. He also helped finance a Jewish bone- marrow registry at the Ezer Mizion medical charity in Tel Aviv, which says it's the largest in the world of its kind.

In Congo, he supports the Chabad-Lubavitch center, which provides religious and educational services to Jews throughout Africa. Gertler's family foundation also contributes to charities operating in Congo, including health centers and Operation Smile, which performs surgery on children born with cleft palates. He has also put $12 million into building an agricultural academy on the outskirts of Kinshasa, the capital, that co-founder Gil Arbel likens to a "Congolese kibbutz."

Gertler's love affair with Congo began in 1997, when the country was one of the top five producers of diamonds in the world. In May of that year, insurgents led by Laurent Kabila, the father of the current president, overthrew the corrupt regime of Mobutu Sese Seko, a U.S. ally who had ruled for 32 years. After taking Kinshasa on May 17, Laurent Kabila declared himself president and renamed the country Democratic Republic of Congo.

Befriending Kabila

A few days later, Gertler's plane touched down. Shlomo Bentolila, chief rabbi of Kinshasa's Chabad-Lubavitch center, arranged for the young diamond merchant to meet Kabila's son Joseph, the new army chief, at the InterContinental hotel, Gertler says.

The two clicked immediately, Gertler recalls. Both carried a heavy responsibility at a young age: Kabila was the commander of tens of thousands of troops, and Gertler was trading $2 billion of diamonds annually, he says.

For the next year, they would often get together before sunrise at Kabila's compound. One day, Kabila suggested that Gertler meet the president. Laurent needed money to fight his war and wanted to offer Gertler a monopoly on Congo's diamond sales, Gertler says. Kabila asked for $20 million in cash, Gertler says. Gertler agreed.

A few days later, he was back in Israel, still celebrating the deal, when the Congolese president called. He needed the money immediately.

Grandfather's Teachings

At 8 a.m., Gertler called Union Bank of Israel Ltd., where he successfully put his grandfather's teachings on building bankers' trust to the test. Using a combination of bank credit, inheritance, cash reserves and liquidated stocks, Gertler scraped together the payment and sent it to the Swiss account of Congo's central bank, he says. Gertler had bet his fortune on a president at war.

The risks he faced became evident in January 2001, when a bodyguard shot Laurent Kabila dead and his son took power. To Gertler's surprise, his friend canceled his diamond monopoly and never explained why, Gertler says. Rather than hold a grudge or sue, Gertler sold diamonds without the monopoly and maintained his ties to Kabila, whom he refers to as "my friend Joseph."

The young president needed friends: When he took over, vast swaths of the country were under the control of rebel factions backed by neighboring Uganda and Rwanda.

Role as Envoy

Kabila asked Gertler to help woo support from the U.S., which had been suspicious of his father's Marxist pedigree -- Che Guevara fought alongside Laurent in Congo in 1965 -- to bolster his position as leader and help start peace negotiations with his neighbors.

In April 2002, Gertler says, he secretly shuttled between Washington, Kinshasa and Kigali, Rwanda, relaying letters between Kabila and Rice. Jendayi Frazer, a former special assistant to then-President George W. Bush, says she met with Gertler several times, both with Rice and on her behalf. Gertler's intervention was instrumental to talks that resulted in a peace accord, says Frazer, who now teaches international politics at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. "He was serious and credible," Frazer says of Gertler. "He wasn't just trading on his friendship with Kabila."

By the time the peace deal was signed between the government and rebel factions in 2002, millions of people had died in Congo -- if not from bullets or machete blows, then from the breakdown of health services and sanitation.

Diamond Sales

Gertler, meanwhile, won back a near monopoly of Congo's diamond trade. One of his companies, Canada-based Emaxon Finance International Inc., paid $15 million in cash and loans to the country's state-owned diamond miner, known as MIBA, for a four- year contract to sell 88 percent of its production.

Congo was desperate for investment at the time, Frazer says. "It's not like he crowded out a lot of other investors," she says. "There weren't many."

Kabila, who had formed a government in which former rebel chiefs were cabinet ministers as part of the peace deal, tried to kick-start Congo's economy. The ministers signed dozens of deals to exploit the country's natural resources with foreign companies, many of them at prices that undervalued the assets, according to reports by the World Bank and the Congolese Parliament.

In 2006, Kabila's People's Party for Reconstruction and Development, with a platform of rebuilding the country's war- ravaged infrastructure, was elected in Congo's first free elections in four decades, certified by the UN.

Mining Review

Kabila promised to tackle corruption and launched a review of mining contracts, observed by several Congolese organizations as well as the Atlanta-based Carter Center, the human rights group founded by former U.S. President Jimmy Carter.

The backroom deals continued, says Peter Rosenblum, a professor of law at Columbia University who headed the Carter Center's mission to observe the mining review. "What happened in 2008 and 2009 really proved that the Gertlers of the world would win by doing business the way they'd been doing it all along," Rosenblum says. Today, Transparency International ranks only a dozen countries below Congo in its Corruption Perceptions Index.

As Kabila cemented his hold on power, Gertler expanded beyond diamonds into mining of other minerals and metals, forging ventures with government firms and foreign partners. Gertler also controls companies that won the rights to two oil blocks along the Ugandan border on Lake Albert, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Charm and Aggression

When asked whether his companies have stakes in the blocks, Gertler replies, "If there is the right opportunity for us to have a big oil play in Congo or somewhere else, we will definitely go for it."

Six mining executives who have done business with Gertler say he mixes charm and aggressiveness to make deals. During negotiations, which are often in French -- a language Gertler only partially understands -- he will be hunched over his BlackBerry, seemingly oblivious to the debate, says Pieter Deboutte, the Belgian who runs Gertler's business in Congo.

Then, suddenly, he'll catch everyone off guard by interjecting, "Stop, wait a bit!" and launch into a list of orders in English to his staff, Deboutte says.

Big Profits

Gertler's dealings can be wildly profitable. In one case, he earned a 500 percent return in just six months without risking a single penny as the middleman in a deal for Societe Miniere de Kabolela & Kipese SPRL, or SMKK, which owns a copper and cobalt deposit in the heart of Katanga's richest mining zone.

In 2009, SMKK was half-owned by the state's Gecamines, short for La Generale des Carrieres & des Mines, and half-owned by ENRC, the Kazakh-founded mining company that's listed on the London Stock Exchange. ENRC wanted to acquire all of SMKK but didn't exercise its right of first refusal to buy the government's stake, according to the joint-venture agreement.

Instead, ENRC made a deal with a company controlled by Gertler's family trust -- Emerald Star Enterprises Ltd., based in the British Virgin Islands. On Dec. 21, 2009, ENRC paid the Gertler firm $25 million for an option to buy the remaining 50 percent stake of SMKK, according to filings ENRC made with the London Stock Exchange.

Gertler didn't even own the asset he was selling the option on -- at least not yet.

'Maximize Value'

In February 2010, Gecamines agreed to sell its shares in SMKK to Gertler's Emerald Star for $15 million, according to the sales agreement published by the mines ministry.

Four months later, ENRC completed the transaction by buying Gertler's Emerald Star for $50 million -- paying a total of $75 million, or five times the price Gertler paid for the asset. Gertler says it's not his fault if the government didn't get a good price for its SMKK holding.

"That is what we know how to do better than anyone else: We know how to maximize value for our projects," he says. "If the government would like to hire my services to maximize value for their stake, they should approach me. No problem."

Gecamines' current managers declined to comment because, they said, they took over the company after the transaction, which was detailed in an ENRC earnings report released in May 2010. ENRC declined to comment.

Copper's Attraction

Copper is what attracts most miners to Congo, Gertler says. The metal traded at $7,991 a ton in London on Dec. 5, more than double its price of $3,190 on Jan. 5, 2009. The belt of earth that stretches from northern Zambia into southern Congo holds one of the world's biggest reserves of copper.

About 37 miles from SMKK, Gertler has a copper and cobalt joint venture with ENRC known as Comide SPRL. Touring around the mine, Gertler jumps behind the wheel of a small bus. While his associates laugh nervously, Gertler almost crashes into two parked helicopters and then speeds around the mounds of ore, sending his passengers reeling across their seats.

"He's like a kid," Yariv Bahat, Gertler's exploration manager, yells, sweat streaming down his face. Gertler says he hasn't had a driver's license for years.

Gertler increased his stake in the mining property in 2011 -- one of at least six assets the state sold to him that year, according to company documents obtained by Bloomberg.

A company based in the British Virgin Islands, Straker International Corp., bought state-owned Gecamines' 25 percent stake in the Comide project in 2011, according to Comide board minutes from June 29, 2011. Gertler controls Straker, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Unannounced Deal

The full details of the sale weren't published, in breach of the terms of the IMF's loan agreement with Congo, resulting in the Fund's decision this month to cancel its program with the country, the IMF says. Gecamines Chairman Albert Yuma says he wasn't aware of the sale. Gertler refuses to discuss it.

In another deal, in June 2010 and March 2011, state-owned miner Societe de Developpement Industriel & Minier du Congo, or Sodimico, sold more than 30 mining licenses, including those for two copper projects, to Gertler-linked companies based in Hong Kong and the British Virgin Islands for a total of $60 million. Numis Securities and Oriel Securities estimated the two projects to be worth $1.6 billion, though their valuations included ore- processing plants as well as the licenses.

Sodimico didn't even get to keep all of the money it made from Gertler's companies, Laurent Lambert Tshisola Kangoa, its chief executive officer, told Bloomberg News in July 2011. He said the mines ministry demanded he give $10 million to the country's general election fund.

'Not Economic'

"It was not an economic decision by Sodimico," he said of the sale. Gertler's joint venture relinquished the rights to the biggest of the mines, Frontier, according to the mines ministry. In July 2012, Congo sold ENRC the license for Frontier, which in 2009 had been the country's biggest taxpayer, for $101.5 million.

"When you see similar things with slightly different variations happening again and again, you have to stop and think, 'Obviously something is going wrong,'" Daniel Balint- Kurti, chief researcher at Congo for Global Witness, told the U.K. Parliament's International Development Committee in 2011.

At the Mutanda project, too, Gertler paid far less for his 20 percent than his partner, Glencore International, paid for similar assets. Gertler's stake came to light only in May 2011 - - months after it was purchased -- when Glencore spelled out the mine's ownership deep in the 1,637-page prospectus for its initial share sale.

Stake's Value

Glencore's outside consulting firm valued the entire mine at about $3 billion. Based on net present value calculations using figures from Glencore's May 2011 prospectus, Gertler's stake, including royalties and other payments, was worth $849 million at the time.

One of Gertler's British Virgin Islands-based companies bought the stake from Gecamines for $120 million in March 2011, according to a copy of the contract Gecamines published under pressure from the IMF. About a year later, in May 2012, Glencore paid $340 million, plus $140 million in assumed debt, for 20 percent of the mine, increasing its holding to 60 percent. Gertler says Glencore's 20 percent purchase was worth more than his because it gave them control of the company.

Glencore CEO Ivan Glasenberg says Gertler has played an important role in Congo.

'Supportive Shareholder'

"His involvement has helped to attract much-needed foreign investment to the DRC," Glasenberg says. "He has been a supportive shareholder with us in our largest operation in the country, Katanga," he says, referring to Katanga Mining Ltd. (KAT), a nearby copper producer that they co-own.

Surveying the land around one of his cobalt mines, Gertler says he will stick by Congo. "I took a decision that I wanted to be a long-term player in Congo," he says, adding that his aim is to help develop Congo as well as to enrich himself and his family. "At the end of the day, yes, I'm looking to create a lot of wealth."

Gertler dismisses critics who say he's amassed a fortune at the expense of the world's poorest people. "Our deals and performance speak for themselves," he says. "And whoever doesn't feel comfortable investing with us will not."

To contact the reporters on this story: Michael J. Kavanagh in Kinshasa at mkavanagh9@bloomberg.net; Franz Wild in Johannesburg at fwild@bloomberg.net; Jonathan Ferziger in Tel Aviv at jferziger@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Laura Colby in New York at lcolby@bloomberg.net; Melissa Pozsgay at mpozsgay@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPad: http://m.bloomberg.com/ipad/


Sent from my iPad

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Singapore Wages May Worsen Fastest Rich-World Inflation: Economy

//there no free lunch. Tokyo and New York both do fine.



Singapore Wages May Worsen Fastest Rich-World Inflation: Economy

When dozens of Chinese bus drivers held Singapore's first strike in 26 years last week, the island deported the perpetrators. Getting rid of the soaring prices that are emboldening calls for higher wages won't be as easy.

Rising housing, transportation and business costs have given the city state the fastest inflation among the developed world's biggest economies. The illegal protest by the SMRT Corp. (MRT) drivers in late November may herald a further escalation in price pressures, as even foreign laborers whose cheaper wages have helped restrain inflation express dissatisfaction with their incomes.

"All price go up, only salary no up," Delowar Hussin, a Bangladeshi laborer, said as he hauled a bag of concrete debris into a dumpster outside a Singapore office tower housing Morgan Stanley (MS) and Citigroup Inc. (C) Hussin, 41, said he earns a basic wage of S$18 ($15) a day, a rate that hasn't changed in the past four years even as his monthly living costs jumped to as much as S$400 from less than S$300.

Singapore is grappling with the elevated inflation that comes with years of economic growth and population expansion on an island smaller than New York City, with rising demand fueling record property and car prices. The country tightened monetary policy this year while neighbors from Thailand to the Philippines cut interest rates, spurring gains in the currency even as the government predicts gross domestic product will rise at the slowest pace in three years.

Adjustment Period

"Singapore Inc. is facing an adjustment period and there is no easy way out," said Kit Wei Zheng, an economist at Citigroup who previously worked for the Monetary Authority of Singapore. "The work-cheap model is reaching its limits especially since the cost of living is high. With inflation likely to stay above historical averages, macroeconomic policy will likely remain on a tightening bias."

Singapore has the highest inflation rate among 27 economies with GDP of at least $100 billion and classified by the International Monetary Fund as advanced. Price gains on the island of 5.3 million people have reached 4 percent or more every month bar one since November 2010, more than double the 1.9 percent average in the past two decades.

Inflation is forecast by the central bank to average more than 4.5 percent this year and be in a 3.5 percent-to-4.5 percent range in 2013. "Persistent tightness" in the labor market will support slightly stronger wage increases in 2013, which will continue to be passed through to consumer prices, the central bank and Trade Ministry said last month.

More Strife

"I wouldn't be surprised if labor strife becomes a more frequent occurrence going forward," said Irvin Seah, an economist at DBS Group Holdings Ltd. in Singapore. "High inflation will very likely persist in the years ahead. Workers will surely demand higher wages to compensate for their loss in real income."

In a country that's host to 2 million foreigners, many hotels, restaurants, builders and shipyards rely on overseas workers willing to toil for lower wages than Singaporeans, and employers are bracing for the possibility of further discord. Two workers from China refused to come down from the top of a crane today, Channel NewsAsia reported on its website. Police said the incident was related to a work dispute and that Singapore Civil Defence Force and Ministry of Manpower officials are also at the scene.

Singapore Health Services Pte, the country's largest healthcare group with more than 16,000 employees, is reviewing its business contingency plans in the aftermath of the drivers' strike, said Goh Leong Huat, deputy group director of human resources for the government-linked operator of hospitals and polyclinics.

The government said in March it will spend about S$200 million to increase salaries of healthcare workers. About 20 percent of public healthcare employees were foreigners at the end of 2011, according to the Health Ministry.

China Salaries

Average urban salaries in China increased 12 percent in the first nine months from a year earlier without adjusting for inflation, after climbing 14.4 percent for all of 2011 and 13.3 percent in 2010, government data show. In Indonesia, the government said it may raise the lowest required wages to 2 million rupiah ($208) a month, while Malaysia this year joined Thailand and Vietnam in implementing a minimum income. Singapore doesn't have such a rate.

"Wages in neighboring countries are playing huge catch-up and in China in particular, wages have been outstripping GDP growth," said Vishnu Varathan, a Singapore-based economist at Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. "People will start assessing whether the trade-offs to come to a foreign land, working long hours and being away from the family is worth it."

Job Creation

Median monthly incomes in Singapore rose 7.1 percent this year without adjusting for inflation, after climbing 8.3 percent in 2011, according to a preliminary report on the island's workforce by the Manpower Ministry last month.

Singapore's jobless rate fell to 1.9 percent last quarter, while Australia reported today its unemployment rate unexpectedly dropped in November. New Zealand's central bank kept interest rates unchanged, while South Korea's economy grew less than initially estimated in the third quarter.

The European Central Bank and the Bank of England will probably keep their benchmark rates unchanged today, according to Bloomberg surveys. A report may show the euro-area economy succumbed to a recession for the second time in four years last quarter, reiterating an earlier estimate. The U.S. Labor Department may say fewer Americans filed first-time claims for unemployment insurance payments last week, a survey showed.

Currency Gains

Singapore, which uses the exchange rate to manage inflation, unexpectedly refrained from slowing the pace of its currency's appreciation in its October policy review even after the economy contracted last quarter. The Singapore dollar's 6.3 percent gain this year has done little to damp inflation stemming from domestic price pressures.

Home prices climbed to a record in the third quarter, and the cost of a permit for a small car rose to an unprecedented S$78,523 on Dec. 5, from S$46,889 at the start of the year. The country auctions limited vehicle permits to control congestion and pollution.

Adding to price pressures is a government drive to cool the inflow of foreign workers, after voter anger against competition for jobs, education and housing boosted support for the political opposition in elections last year. Opposition parties have said that the large numbers of overseas workers have depressed local wages.

Higher car and property prices and the measures to tighten rules on hiring overseas workers are driving up the "overall cost structure" of the economy, spurring inflationary pressures that are a result of "self-imposed" policies, according to DBS's Seah.

Losing Edge

"Singapore used to have the upper hand on inflation but somehow has been losing its edge in this aspect in recent years," said Seah, who formerly worked for Singapore's Trade Ministry. "Inflation will remain significantly higher than normal for as long as those policy measures remain in place. The policies are growth-limiting and pushing Singapore closer and closer toward the brink of recession."

The city-state avoided falling into a technical recession after second-quarter GDP data was revised to show the economy grew. The $240 billion economy is forecast by the government to expand about 1.5 percent this year and 1 percent to 3 percent in 2013.

The dispute between SMRT and more than a hundred of its bus drivers from China led to the repatriation of 29 protesters, while five others were charged in court for instigating the strike. Of the five, one was sentenced to six weeks' jail on Dec. 3 while the rest were allowed bail after appearing in court today.

Wage Disparity

At the core of the disagreement was a disparity in wages that the company pays the Chinese nationals and their Malaysian and Singaporean counterparts. Even before the strike, SMRT, the island's biggest subway operator and one of its two main bus companies, had said that rising wage costs would impact its profitability.

The incident highlighted lingering public resentment for the presence of some foreigners in the country, even as it showed overseas laborers demanding better treatment from their Singapore employers.

In a snap poll of 313 Singapore citizens conducted by a government feedback unit and released after the strike, about eight of 10 respondents said the Chinese drivers should be "punished to the full extent of the law" and authorities have "acted swiftly" to bring the situation under control.

For Hussin, who has to support his wife, child and mother in Bangladeshi city of Khulna, the repercussions of asking for higher pay may be more than he can afford.

"Not happy also no choice, have to work," he said. "I want to ask my boss for more money but scared he will scold and tell me to go back to Bangladesh. Maybe after my contract over, I look for other company that pay me more or go home."

To contact the reporter on this story: Shamim Adam in Singapore at sadam2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Stephanie Phang at sphang@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPad: http://m.bloomberg.com/ipad/


Sent from my iPad

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

BBC E-mail: Greece 'most corrupt' EU country

// Who came first? The corruption or the slashed public spending?


** Greece 'most corrupt' EU country **
Greece is perceived to have the most corrupt public sector of all 27 EU countries, a new global survey reveals.
< http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20605869 >


** Disclaimer **
The BBC is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the BBC's views or opinions. Please note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the sender have been verified.

Paulson Said to Blame Bet Against Europe for Most of Loss

// you don't blame the bet against Europe, you blame YOURSELF for making the bet against Europe.

Now where is Soros, the poor guy who shorted Europe? Did he put his money where his mouth was? Or did he say one thing and do another?


Paulson Said to Blame Bet Against Europe for Most of Loss

John Paulson, manager of $20 billion in hedge funds, told investors that the bulk of his losses this year came on bets that the European sovereign-debt crisis would worsen, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Paulson, speaking to clients at his firm's annual meeting yesterday in New York, said he has reduced those positions following European Central Bank President Mario Draghi's comments in July that the ECB was committed to preserving the euro, said the person, who asked not to be identified because the meeting was private.

Paulson said in a February letter to investors that the euro was "structurally flawed" and would eventually fall apart. In April, the founder of New York-based Paulson & Co. told clients he was wagering against European sovereign bonds and buying credit-default swaps on European debt, or protection against the chance of default.

Paulson's Advantage Plus fund, which seeks to profit from corporate events such as takeovers and bankruptcies and uses leverage to amplify returns, lost 3 percent in October and was down 17 percent in the first 10 months of this year. The Advantage strategy, which includes the firm's similar Advantage Plus fund, has $6 billion in assets. Paulson Credit Opportunities, the firm's largest strategy, with $6.1 billion in assets as of the third quarter, rose 3.8 percent in October and 6 percent this year.

Paulson lost 51 percent in his Advantage Plus Fund in 2011, mostly on a failed bet on an economic rebound.

Armel Leslie, a spokesman for Paulson & Co., declined to comment on the meeting.

Hires, Departures

Paulson said his firm added seven investment staff members this year and five departed, leaving the team at 52 people, according to the person, who attended the meeting at the Time Warner Center in Manhattan.

Among the departures was Nikolai Petchenikov, who had worked at Paulson & Co. for 12 years and was a managing director in London, Paulson said, according to the person. The firm hired Mark Gordon, a former Soros Fund Management LLC employee, to focus on energy; Rajeev Shah, formerly of Soundpost Partners LP, for technology; and Ned Dybvig, previously of Camulos Capital LP and Soros's firm, for distressed investments, Paulson said, according to the person.

Paulson also said one of the bright spots in the U.S. economy is the recovery in housing, according to the person. Paulson, 56, became a billionaire in 2007 by betting against subprime mortgages. He started buying residential and commercial mortgage securities in late 2008 and 2009. Other hedge-fund managers who have reversed bets against the U.S. housing market include Kyle Bass of Hayman Capital Management LP and Greg Lippmann of LibreMax Capital LLC.

To contact the reporter on this story: Kelly Bit in New York at kbit@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christian Baumgaertel at cbaumgaertel@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPad: http://m.bloomberg.com/ipad/


Sent from my iPad

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

"Don't 'Gangnam Style' anymore," says Jay Chou


//Entertainers are nothing if they don't entertain. The world loves Gangnam Style, and if Jay Chou should make something better than Gangnam style instead of confirming his lack of intellect.



"Don't 'Gangnam Style' anymore," says Jay Chou
Posted: 04 December 2012 1830 hrs


BEIJING: Taiwan singer Jay Chou urged Mandarin music stars to "unite" and stay ahead of the Korean wave during an awards ceremony in Beijing on Sunday, reported Taiwan media.

"All artistes should unite and don't 'Gangnam Style' anymore," said Chou.

Chou described "Gangnam Style" as being quite humorous, but said Mandarin music is cooler.

He added that Mandarin music fans should support Mandarin music, and not let the Korean wave get too strong.

Interestingly, Chou sported a head of blonde hair when he made his statement, a look that resembled those sported by Korean pop stars.

However, Chou dismissed allegation that he had copied their look, and said that he dyed his hair blonde to match his killer abs.

While nobody can say for sure whether K-pop inspired his new look, it is clear that he does have killer abs.

The superstar had showed off his well-defined eight pack in recent promotional photos taken on the set of his new music video.

Chou revealed that he now weighed only 62kg and is in top physical shape.

"I used to pant when I sing 'Nunchucks' (a high-energy song), now I find it much easier," said Chou.

-CNA/ha

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Robert Dahlberg NZ broker - Sentence too short: victims of Robert Dahlberg


//Slammed someone against a pillar and kicked him in the face - 6 months for that? That's not justice - not even in the West, let alone in Singapore. Somethings wrong here. Hopefully, Robert Dahlberg never gets employed again.


Sentence too short: victims

By Cherie Howie Email Cherie

5:30 AM Sunday Dec 2, 2012

A Kiwi broker jailed in Singapore for attacking two men could be

home by Christmas, his father says.

But the victims of former junior Tall Black Robert Dahlberg say they

are still waiting for an apology and that the five-month jail sentence

given to the 35-year-old for the attack was not long enough.

Dahlberg has been in jail since September when he was arrested after

returning to Singapore. He had spent more than a year on the run

when he skipped bail and left the country.

Last week Dahlberg was sentenced to five months' jail. He had

admitted voluntarily causing hurt to Paul Liew, who suffered a gash to his head and a broken nose after

Dahlberg slammed him against a pillar and kicked him in the face during a brawl that also involved two of

Dahlberg's friends. The trio had just left a black-tie charity event called White Collar Boxing.

Another charge of causing hurt by a rash act, which occurred when Dahlberg punched Liew's friend

Laurence Wong in the head, was taken into consideration by the sentencing judge.

Dahlberg's Nelson-based father Bill told the Herald on Sunday the family was relieved the sentencing was

over. "He'll be home for Christmas ... because there's time off for good behaviour."

His son had no plans to appeal against the sentence, but the family has to wait another 10 days to hear

whether the deputy prosecutor's office will appeal.

Dahlberg, who travelled to Singapore to support his son during the sentencing, would not comment on

whether he thought the sentence was fair, or how his son had reacted.

Liew said no sentence was ever enough to make up for the trauma victims suffered.

He had been diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder and avoided crowded places, but could not

afford to pay for counselling.

"I can see the line on my forehead [from the attack] every morning in the mirror. It's an unfortunate

reminder."

Dahlberg had twice offered him $20,000 compensation, but Liew turned the offers down because they were

made while Dahlberg was on the run.

Dahlberg was not remorseful. "Paul and I have not received any apology from him at all." He felt sorry for

Dahlberg's parents, as their son's actions had shamed the family name. "After knowing that his mother

wailed in court, I can tell how heartbroken and disappointed she is."

By Cherie Howie Email Cherie

EFSF, European Stability Mechanism Ratings Cut to Aa1 by Moody’s


Confirms the irrelevance of Moody's in today's world, it's no different from Muddy Waters.


EFSF, European Stability Mechanism Ratings Cut to Aa1 by Moody's

The European Stability Mechanism and European Financial Stability Facility were downgraded by Moody's Investors Service, which cited a high correlation in credit risk present among the entities' largest financial supporters.

The ESM was cut to Aa1 from Aaa, while the EFSF provisional rating was lowered to (P)Aa1 from (P)Aaa. Moody's said in a statement that it would maintain a negative outlook on each. The EFSF has about 161.8 billion euros ($210.1 billion) of bonds outstanding according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The move follows downgrades of the EFSF's second-biggest contributor after France lost its top grade at Moody's and Standard and Poor's this year. Investors often ignore such ratings actions, evidenced by the drop in France's 10-year bond yields since last week's Moody's downgrade and a rally in Treasuries after the U.S. lost its AAA at S&P in 2011.

The EFSF's "rating is at the mercy of the creditworthiness of its biggest backers," Nicholas Spiro, managing director of Spiro Sovereign Strategy in London, said before the actions. "Another downgrade of the EFSF would show how the creditworthiness of the euro zone's rescue fund itself is being affected by the worsening economic conditions in the core."

About half the time, government bond yields move in the opposite direction suggested by new ratings, according to data compiled by Bloomberg in June on 314 upgrades, downgrades and outlook changes going back to 1974.

'High Correlation'

EFSF debt declined on the fund's last credit downgrade, when S&P cut the rating by one level to AA+ on Jan 16. The yield premium over benchmark government debt of the EFSF's 5 billion euros of 2.75 percent senior, unsecured bonds due July 2016 increased 13 basis points on the day of the downgrade to 155 basis points, according to Bloomberg prices. The spread has since narrowed to 55 basis points.

Moody's statement said that "there is a high correlation in credit risk among the entities' supporters is consistent with the evolution to date of the euro area debt crisis and the close institutional, economic and financial linkages among the major euro area sovereigns."

All the debt securities that have been drawn down to date from the EFSF were also downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa, according to the statement released late yesterday.

'Exceptionally Strong'

The Luxembourg-based EFSF was formed in 2010 to provide loans to cash-strapped European Union countries. The ESM will replace the temporary EFSF, which has spent 192 billion euros of its 440 billion euros on loans to Ireland, Portugal and Greece. The two funds will run in parallel until the EFSF is phased out in mid- 2013.

'Moody's rating decision is difficult to understand," Klaus Regling, managing director of the ESM and chief executive officer of the EFSF, said in a statement. "We disagree with the rating agency's approach, which does not sufficiently acknowledge ESM's exceptionally strong institutional framework, political commitment and capital structure."

The 500 billion-euro ESM was set up to aid debt-swamped countries and declared operational on Oct. 8. The fund's birth was eased by the European Central Bank's offer in August to buy bonds of fiscally struggling countries, which has driven down interest rates in Spain and Italy and bought European governments time to address the root causes of the crisis.

Moody's said after its Nov. 19 downgrade of France that it will assess the implications of the move for the ratings of the EFSF and ESM. It would focus on whether the support available from the remaining top-rated guarantors and shareholders is "consistent with the EFSF and ESM retaining the highest ratings," the ratings firm said in a statement at the time.

The short-term issuer rating of the ESM remains unchanged at Prime-1, while the provisional short-term rating of the EFSF were kept at (P)Prime-1.

A provisional rating for a debt facility is an indication of the rating that Moody's would likely assign to future draw- downs from the facility, pending the receipt of documentation detailing the terms of the debt issuance, the New York-based company said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Craig Stirling in London at cstirling1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Dave Liedtka at dliedtka@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPad: http://m.bloomberg.com/ipad/


Sent from my iPad

Saturday, December 1, 2012

29 SMRT bus drivers' work permits revoked, to be deported

// As I had foreseen.



SINGAPORE: One more bus driver involved in the SMRT bus illegal strike will be charged in court on Monday, bringing the total number of bus drivers to be prosecuted to five.

On Thursday, four bus drivers were charged with instigating fellow bus drivers to take part in the strike that took place earlier this week.

In a statement, the Manpower Ministry (MOM) and the Home Affairs Ministry (MHA) said that a summons was obtained on Saturday for the fifth person to be charged.

Authorities said he is considered a hostile and aggressive participant in the illegal strike.

If convicted, the five face a maximum jail term of 12 months and fine of up to S$2,000 each.

Earlier this week, more than 100 SMRT bus drivers from China took part in an illegal strike as they were unhappy over their salaries and housing conditions.

In addition, 29 SMRT bus drivers who took part in the illegal strike are now in custody. Their work permits have been revoked and they will be repatriated.

These 29 bus drivers were either absent from work on either or both days of the strike.

The authorities said more than 150 bus drivers who were involved but returned to work when they realised that it was an illegal strike, will be issued warnings.

No further action will be taken against them and they will be allowed to work here as long as they abide by Singapore laws.

Barring any new development, the authorities said they do not expect further arrests or repatriations related to the illegal strike.

The authorities said that the strike was planned and premeditated and it disrupted Singapore's public transport which is an essential service and posed a threat to public order.

The authorities added that while the bus drivers may have had grievances, they should have raised the matter through legal and proper means.

Speaking at a news conference, Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin said that the government has acted in deliberate and measured way as it was important to preserve Singapore's industrial harmony.

He added that Singapore laws must be upheld regardless of nationality.

Mr Tan said lessons can be drawn from this episode and that SMRT should have better handled the matter.

Also at the news conference, Minister of State for Transport Josephine Teo said given that 29 bus drivers will be repatriated, services will be affected slightly.

All services will continue but commuters can expect to wait slightly longer on some routes.

- CNA/ck

El Salvador and Mongolia: solid bet, or bubble?



//90% of those bond holders are making decisions sitting behind desks in new york or london and reading from FT or WSJ. If you're on the ground, and you know better than them, then profit from it.



High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/11/30/el-salvador-and-mongolia-solid-bet-or-bubble/#ixzz2DlxPgElg


El Salvador and Mongolia: solid bet, or bubble?
November 30, 2012 5:56 pm by Pan Kwan Yuk


Is El Salvador, a poor Central American country struggling to overcome a violent history, a safer bet than Portugal? And is Mongolia, a country that has been rescued five times in the past 22 years by the International Monetary Fund, a better investment thesis than Spain?

Bond investors seem to think so.

In the latest sign of just how desperate return-starved investors are for incremental yields and their increasing willingness to go down the credit curve to chase them, the two frontier countries on Thursday pulled off issues that stunned the market in both their pricings and take-up rates.

El Salvador raised $800m from international investors with a 12-year dollar-denominated bond. The issue, which attracted $5.1bn in orders, was priced at a yield of just 5.875 per cent. This compares with Portugal’s 10-year bond yield, which currently sits at 7.407 per cent.

Meanwhile, Mongolia, which has been something of a darling among EM investors in recent years but whose shine has been tarnished by weaker global commodity prices and changes to foreign investment rules, succeeded in raising $1.5bn in a two-part offering.

The $500m, five-year tranche sold at 4.125 per cent yield while the larger 10-year $1bn tranche priced at a yield of 5.125 per cent. Spain’s 10-year bond yield is at 5.303 per cent. The Mongolian offering was 10 times oversubscribed, attracting $15bn in bids.

The numbers make for some mind-boggling reading, says Robert Abad, emerging markets specialist at Western Asset Management.

The Bolivia deal which came out a few weeks ago confirmed that turbo-charged global liquidity conditions are allowing issuers to come to market at yields that are probably half of what they would have had to offer investors if credit conditions were normal”, he told beyondbrics.

“The sub-5 per cent on that particular deal came as a surprise to EM veterans,” he added. “But as we all know, the market has a very short memory, so it is not as surprising to see Mongolia accessing the markets at yields that do not fully capture the risks inherent in a fast growing country with a limited history of managing economic cycles.”

Although Mongolia’s $10bn economy is one of the fastest-growing in the world and the country sits atop vast reserves of copper, coal and gold, Abad said he decided to sit out on the issue.

“In my opinion, these yields reflect very little spread premium, if any, for the risk,” he said.

Not everyone feels that way of course, as the overwhelmingly strong demand for the issue showed.

With returns on investment grade emerging markets such as Mexico and Brazil no longer as attractive as they once were, many investors have started to take their money to riskier places like Zambia, Bolivia and now Mongolia and El Salvador.

“In the case of Mongolia, one way to think about it is would you rather have the financial surpluses but political risk of Mongolia or the euro blow-up risk of Spain?” asks Gabriel Sterne, an economist at Exotix. “I guess the market’s verdict is the former, and I for one wouldn’t quarrel too much with that.

“But if and when the Fed starts tightening, it’s hard too imagine yields staying this low.”

In a market with razor-thin yields, one EM debt banker argued rarity and investors’ desire to diversify their portfolios won the day for both Mongolia and El Salvador.

“Everything is relative,” said the person. “Sub 6 per cent might look cheap for El Salvador but it’s pretty appetizing for investors who are getting 2.53 per cent from Mexico 10-year and 1.61 per cent from US 10-year T-bills.”

But are investors doing their homework? Ultimately, they are making a wager that the countries behind the issues will be able to service their debts. And as the ongoing negotiations over Belize’s default over a $544m bond and the debt restructuring of Saint Kitts and Nevis, the Caribbean island federation, show, governments – when pressed against the wall – won’t hesitate from reneging on their creditors.

The fact that El Salvador was able to pull off its issue at a sub-6 per cent yield is made all the more surprising by the fact that the country was downgraded by Moody’s to “Baa2″, or three levels below investment grade, only last month. (Fitch maintained its “BB” rating on the country with a negative outlook).

In its report, Moody’s called attentioned to El Salvador’s debt, which amounts to 51 per cent of GDP and limits its capacity to resist future shocks.

The US dollar has been the national currency for more than a decade. The country’s export profile is similar to that of its Central American neighbors: the offshore garment and textile industry, tropical fruits and shrimps.

GDP is forecast by Fitch for this year at 1.3 per cent, the lowest in Central America, and FDI is minimal.

The economy is strongly dependent on remittances, which rose 7.2 per cent year-on-year to hit $3.2bn by the end of October. They account for almost a fifth of GDP.

While some critics will point to the two issues as more signs of a bubble forming in the EM debt space, Abad thinks it is nowhere close to bursting yet.

“Rates in the developed world will remain low for some time allowing for more yield and spread compression in risk assets,” he says. “However, because technical considerations are overwhelming fundamentals, the job for investors is to remain disciplined and alert. Without such restraint, they risk chasing yield and falling into an abyss once fundamentals reassert themselves.”

Additional reporting by Ron Buchanan


Muddy Waters threatens to counter-sue Olam (but not Glencore)


//Muddy Waters has clear incentives to find a prey and attack it, and bring shorts with it. Its targets are quite simple - preferably large, toothless preys, in industries that people do not really understand (people get shocked when their attention is drawn to high leverage in the commodities trading business), and non American. First Sino-Forest, then Focus Media, now Olam. 

No, Glencore is in the same business but that one is a 1000 pound gorilla, better keep away from it (for now).




Muddy Waters threatens to counter-sue Olam
Posted: 30 November 2012 1440 hrs

SINGAPORE: US-based short-seller Muddy Waters threatened to counter-sue farm commodities trader Olam and its chief executive for defamation as a war of words between the companies escalated.

Muddy Waters on Friday said Olam chief executive Sunny Verghese crossed the line during a conference call this week when he accused the US firm of being a front for hedge funds to drive down the shares of the Singapore-listed company.

In a statement it asked Verghese to apologise, warning that Muddy Waters reserved the right to take legal action against Olam, which has already filed a lawsuit in Singapore seeking unspecified damages from the research firm.

Muddy Waters triggered panic selling of Olam shares after its influential founder Carson Block told an investment forum in London earlier this month he was betting against the company, citing flawed accounting standards that masked its debts.

It later released a scathing 133-page report supporting its allegations and warned that Olam had a "high risk" of collapsing like US energy trader Enron did in 2001.

Olam fired back with a 45-page rebuttal which stressed that the company is on a sound financial footing.

In a conference call with analysts and the media late Wednesday, Verghese said Muddy Waters was being used as a front for some hedge funds to drive down Olam shares in the hope of profiting from it later.

Short-sellers borrow shares and sell them in the hope their price will drop. They can then buy the shares back at a cheaper price and profit from the difference.

"Muddy Waters has always been transparent about our economic incentives," the US firm said Friday.

"We do, however, draw the line at being called 'manipulators' and being accused of acting in concert with a group of hedge funds to drive down the price of Olam shares".

Describing Verghese's remarks as defamatory, Muddy Waters said "we demand a full retraction and apology" and warned that "we reserve the right to pursue legal action against him and Olam for these baseless statements".

Muddy Waters also offered to pay for Olam to get its bonds rated by credit watchdog Standard and Poor's.

There was no immediate comment from Olam, which sources products including cocoa, coffee, cashew, sesame and rice from 65 countries and supplies them to more than 11,600 customers.

Muddy Waters' assessments of companies have been closely monitored, especially after a report in 2011 forced Chinese timber supplier Sino-Forest Corp to file for bankruptcy protection.

Olam shares were trading at S$1.55 in early afternoon trade, down slightly from Thursday's close and 11 percent lower since November 19 when Block first made his comments.


- AFP/ir

Life of Pi - Review (plus my comments)


//My point here is that lots of people actually try to make "Life of Pi" something it is not. People actually argue whether the clouds today look like a boat or a rabbit. And they get upset when they are told it is not only looks like, but it is, a automobile....

There's a reason why 5 publishers rejected this book before - because it read like nonsense - until someone decided they could let people imagine what the book is trying to tell them and change your faith in God!



Rated 5 of 5 of 5 by Zoe 
(For those who have finished the book)

I also disagree with what seems to be the general consensus on the meaning behind Yann Martel's Life of Pi. I do not believe that Martel intended either story to be open to reader analyses, or for us to choose which story we believe to be the "truth". [you're thinking too much - Martel just wanted to spin a yarn] Nor do I believe that what Martel intended us to take away from the story is the idea that we "can choose our own reality". Indeed many reviews have questioned which of Pi's stories are true, yet it is neither of them that is the complete truth, neither fits completely, or is entirely credible.

Take, for example, the meerkat bones left in the boat, they destroy the credibility of the story without animals- or the island. Infact, it is not a question of truth, but what is reality- what really happened in the ocean, and what really happened in Pi's mind. [huh?]

Both stories are "true". The story without animals is mostly what physically happened. The story with animals is what spiritually happened for Pi. Both occured simultaneously, thus the story of Pi is not simply a tale of his journey across the Pacific, but the journey of his spirit also.

Many readers are caught up in thinking that Pi is deluded, that he consciously replaces each person on the lifeboat with an animal so that he can cope with the situation. However, Pi does not do this, as some may be led to believe, to cope, but because he is on a spiritual journey as well as a physical journey. Martel conveys to us that we are all on two journeys in our lives. 

The spiritual journey, as I have already said, is the story with the animals, the story that holds truth in Pi's mind, while the people story is a physical reality. these two stories run parallel, and meet at the point where Pi meets the blind Frenchman. This is what tells us that both stories have an element of truth. Pi did talk to Richard Parker ( who represents the animal instinct in Pi) on his spiritual journey, and he also talked to the blind Frenchman (who is actually the cook). This is where his spiritual being meets his reality.

Life of Pi is also about the conflict between doubt and hope. The oil tanker represents Pi's hope [it could also mean, just a ship carrying oil], while the rubbish that floats past are his doubts [or just rubbish, you know, the trash in the trashbin]. The part where Pi recovers from his blindness show all his doubts being washed away, indeed, from this point on he is able to tame Richard Parker with no trouble. He has tamed his doubts.

One reviewer on this site asked how this story makes you believe in God. It does it by comparing two highly unlikely stories, and showing us that we are all on two journeys, and at times our spiritual journey can save us from our reality. We do not "choose our own reality". It is not a matter of choice. We are all on two journeys.

If Martel has had but one success in writing this book it is that he has managed to confuse even the most logical of us, bring out the believing in the most rational of us. Life of Pi is a lesson about all of us. Martel does not spoonfeed a message to us, it is what each of us takes away from this incredible story that determines how true the book is.