Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Geithner Says U.S. To Reach Debt Limit No Later Than May 16

 What a hell of a tough job...


Geithner Says U.S. To Reach Debt Limit No Later Than May 16

The U.S. will reach its $14.29 trillion legal debt limit no later than May 16 unless Congress acts before then, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said today, and he warned of "severe hardship" for Americans if lawmakers fail to act.

If the limit hasn't been raised by May 16, the Treasury Department will turn to a toolkit of emergency measures that can provide up to eight weeks of additional borrowing room, Geithner said. That extra time would end about July 8, the Treasury chief said.

"The longer Congress fails to act, the more we risk that investors here and around the world will lose confidence in our ability to meet our commitments and our obligations," Geithner said in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other members of Congress.

Congress needs to raise the limit to maintain vital services and avoid "questions about our ability to defend our national security interests," Geithner said. The U.S. would face sharply higher interest rates and would have to stop or delay payments to the military, retirees and others, he said.

"Default would cause a financial crisis potentially more severe than the crisis from which we are only now starting to recover," Geithner said. "For these reasons, default by the United States is unthinkable."

Bill Rates

Six-month bill rates declined to a record low today as investors sought the safe haven of short-term government debt. The rate dropped as much as three basis points, or 0.03 percent to 0.1099 percent in New York, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader data. The prior record low of 0.1109 percent was set in November 2009. Treasury also auctioned three- and six-month bills today at the lowest rates since January 2010.

Newly elected Republican lawmakers have been resisting a debt-limit increase while calling for extensive budget cuts. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, has said he won't approve a debt-limit increase without a range of tax-and- spending reforms.

"We need to use the debt limit itself as the way to ensure that America's debt limit begins to decline, not always go up," Rubio said in a March 29 television interview with Fox News. "How about the debt limit starting to go down? These are the kinds of things that I hope we'll focus on."

Holding Hostage

The debt limit fight will be shaped in coming weeks by how voters and markets react to the prospect of a government shutdown, said Stanley Collender, managing director of Qorvis Communications and a former congressional budget analyst. The government's current spending authority ends April 8.

"If there's a shutdown and Republicans take it on the chin politically, their appetite for holding the debt ceiling hostage may go down," Collender said in a telephone interview. "If Democrats take it on the chin or the White House, their appetite for holding the debt ceiling hostage may go up."

The Treasury will conduct its regular schedule of securities auctions in the event of a government shutdown, an official told Bloomberg News today. A shutdown due to a lack of spending authority is not the same as an inability to borrow because of the debt limit.

Geithner said in his letter today that spending cuts can't provide the cash needed now, and he warned that the Treasury's projections won't change in a way that would give Congress extra time. He also said it would not be "viable" for the U.S. to sell gold, financial investments orstudent loans.

'No Alternative'

"There is no alternative to enactment of an increase in the debt limit," Geithner said. He said that increasing the limit "does not increase the obligations we have as a nation; it simply permits the Treasury to fund those obligations that Congress has already established."

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said last week that companies, insurance funds and investors would lose access to markets if the U.S. appears to be headed toward a default related to its debt limit.

"If the United States actually defaults on our debt it would be catastrophic," Dimon, 55, said at a March 30 U.S. Chamber of Commerce event in Washington.

Dimon, who's also chairman of New York-based JPMorgan, the second-biggest U.S. bank by assets, said the U.S. would be "crazy" to leave the debit-limit question unresolved and that market participants eventually would need to take "drastic action."

"Companies like us, every single company with Treasuries, every insurance fund, every requirement, it will start snowballing," Dimon said. "All short-term financing would disappear."

Emergency Measures

Geithner's letter today described the emergency measures his department could take, along with the amount of borrowing room each step could free up. The measures, which have been used by prior administrations, include suspending issuance of state and local government securities, tapping government retirement funds and accessing the exchange stabilization fund.

"These extraordinary measures are less useful than in previous debt limit impasses," Geithner said. These measures can free up about $230 billion, and the debt increases by about $125 billion each month, he said.

Some tools used by prior administrations, such as suspending savings bond sales or tapping the Federal Financing Bank, wouldn't have much impact, Geithner said. Others are no longer possible because of changes in cash management and congressional authority, he said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Rebecca Christie in Washington at rchristie4@bloomberg.net Phil Mattingly in Washington atpmattingly@bloomberg.net.

Friday, March 25, 2011

AU invites Libyan combattants to discuss ceasefire

Libya is a sea across Italy but 6,000km from South Africa. 
Libya isn't part of the African Union and does it even want to be considered part of Africa? 
Is AU a lightweight thinking its an elephant?
I think AU is the biggest joke, get your houses in order, then people will listen to you.

AU invites Libyan combattants to discuss ceasefire
PARIS — The African Union has invited the two sides in the conflict on Libya to its headquarters in Addis Ababa to discuss a ceasefire, AU Commission chief Jean Ping said in Paris Thursday.
"From tomorrow a meeting is planned in Addis Ababa with those pro-Kadhafi and those anti-Kadhafi to lay down a ceasefire," he said at a lecture in the French capital, though he did not say whether such a meeting could take place given the bombing of Libya.
Ping repeated the AU's opposition to the "external military intervention" led by the United States, France and Britain.
He detailed "a programme, a timetable, an agenda" to resolve the crisis that provides for a "ceasefire" to "facilitate humanitarian aid" and "protect foreign immigrant workers" in Libya many of whom come from sub-Saharan Africa.
The plan also seeks to "confirm the legitimate aspirations of the Libyan people for democracy," he said.
Ping said he was sceptical about the next stages of the military operation. "The air exclusion zone, more or less, the aim has been achieved. It was necessary to ensure Benghazi was not taken," he said.
"That is done. What is the next step? There are disagreements, there are quarrels" between coalition members.
"When I ask: what is the next stage? Do you have a road map? I see they do not."
Ping deplored the fact that African nations had not been adequately consulted by the West-led coalition and justified thereby his absence from a Paris summit called by French President Nicolas Sarkozy last Saturday, just before the first strikes.
"Why should I come to Paris for lunch and a photo, when I was not consulted," he said.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

China Rejects Google’s Accusations About Gmail Disruptions



Yeah, it works WITH VPN and doesn't without. enough said.








A Chinese government spokeswoman has rejected accusations by Google that Beijing is making it difficult for users of Google's email service, Gmail, in China to access their accounts. 

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu had a very brief answer to questions about accusations that China is tampering with Gmail access inside China.

Jiang said Google’s accusation is unacceptable, but she did not elaborate.

Asked to respond, Google spokeswoman Jessica Powell said she had nothing to add to the company’s original comment from a few days ago.

"There is no technical issue on our side.  We have checked extensively.  This is a government blockage," Powell said, "carefully designed to look like the problem is with Gmail."

A year ago, Google pulled its Chinese language Internet search engine out of China and relocated it to Hong Kong because of cyber attacks and concerns about Chinese government censorship.

Gmail users in China started having difficulties in late February, with sporadic service ranging from inconsistent to, eventually, almost complete blockage.

Mark Natkin, with Marbridge Consulting, thinks that, if Gmail had been immediately blocked in China, it could provoke "a lot of backlash".

"So, rather than do that, a more subtle approach is to do some short-term blocking or partial blocking and, in that way, to some degree, one can even attribute it - not to some government action - but to 'You have a problem with the network,' or 'You know Japan has had a major earthquake, which may have damaged Internet connection there, so this could have some influence on China connectivity to overseas sites,'" Natkin noted. 

The Internet controls started around the same time that anonymous online calls urged Chinese people to hold their own Jasmine Revolutions, similar to protests that have forced several leaders in the Middle East to step down.

Chinese authorities responded to these calls with a heavy show of force at sites in the cities around the country where organizers called for demonstrations to take place


Monday, March 21, 2011

(BN) Citigroup Will Reinstate Dividend at 1 Cent a Share, Split Stock 1-for-10

Faster than you'd thought in 2009!



Bloomberg News, sent from my iPad.

Citigroup to Reinstate 1-Cent Dividend, Plans Reverse Split

March 21 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc., the U.S. bank that received the largest taxpayer bailout, said it would reinstate a dividend at 1 cent per share in the second quarter after a planned 1-for-10 reverse split of its common stock.

Citigroup, which hasn't paid a quarterly dividend since 2009 because of the financial crisis, will exchange 1 new share for every 10 of common stock after the close of trading on May 6, the New York-based bank said today in a statement.

"It puts some make-up on the black eye they have," said David Knutson, a credit analyst with Legal & General Investment Management, which oversees about $85 million of Citigroup bonds. "They're doing it for the same reason why people put up billboards on the sides of highway. It's advertising, it's marketing."

JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. were among six lenders that disclosed more than $16.2 billion in share buybacks and $5.4 billion of annualized dividend increases on March 18, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The banks made their announcements after learning they passed a Federal Reserve review of their financial health.

Citigroup rose 3 cents, or 0.7 percent, to $4.53 at 10:32 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares were down 4.9 percent this year through March 18, after rising 43 percent in 2010.

'A 2012 Thing'

Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit said last October that the bank wouldn't return capital to shareholders until 2012. On a Jan. 18 call with analysts, he said that returning capital to shareholders, either through a dividend or a share buyback, was "a 2012 thing."

"Citi is a fundamentally different company than it was three years ago," Pandit, 54, said in today's statement. "The reverse stock split and intention to reinstate a dividend are important steps as we anticipate returning capital to shareholders starting next year."

JPMorgan, led by CEO Jamie Dimon, said last week it would increase its dividend to 25 cents a share from 5 cents and authorized a $15 billion stock repurchase. Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest U.S. bank by assets, authorized the repurchase of 200 million shares and increased its dividend to 12 cents.

The nation's biggest banks were required to submit capital plans to the central bank, some of which included requests for dividend increases.

Regulators' 'Blessing'

"It's a blessing from the regulators," said Jason Goldberg, an analyst with Barclays Plc. "From Citi's standpoint, the fact that they got to return to a dividend, while very modest, is somewhat symbolic that the handcuffs are slowly coming off."

A 1-cent quarterly dividend would produce an annualized dividend yield of 0.09 percent based on a reverse split conducted at the March 18 share price. That would be the third- lowest among Standard & Poor's 500 Index companies that pay a dividend, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Citigroup, which reported a profit of $10.6 billion for 2010, will pay $87 million to shareholders for the three final quarters of this year, according to Shannon Bell, a spokeswoman for the bank.

The stock will still trade under the ticker C, and no fractional shares will be issued in connection with the reverse split, the bank said.

Shares Circulating

Citigroup has almost three times as many outstanding shares as any other company in the S&P 500, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The bank has about 29 billion shares, which will be reduced to approximately 2.9 billion by the reverse split.

At last year's annual meeting, the U.S. Treasury Department supported a reverse stock split, "which will address the fact that the company has a much larger number of shares outstanding than is necessary to ensure adequate trading liquidity," the department said at the time.

The U.S. government completed the sale last year of its 7.7 billion common shares, which it obtained after converting a preferred stake acquired through a $45 billion bailout of the bank during the financial crisis.

To contact the reporter on this story: Michael J. Moore in New York at mmoore55@bloomberg.net Donal Griffin in New York at dgriffin10@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Scheer at dscheer@bloomberg.net .

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPad: http://m.bloomberg.com/ipad/


Sent from my iPad

Are we seeing Africa politically colonised by China?

3:45pm
Jacob Zuma, the South African president, said on Monday that his country does not support "the regime change doctrine" in Libya, and called for restraint from foreign countries enforcing a no-fly zone.

Zuma said:
As South Africa we say no to the killing of civilians, no to the regime change doctrine and no to the foreign occupation of Libya,", one of five heads of state on a high-level African Union panel on Libya.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Japan crisis hits global nuclear sector; may boost green power - Dream On!

There is no alternative but to keep trudging on the nuclear path. Of course there are dreamers out there who think God will keep the clouds away for their solar, and the wind will blow just right, not too fast, not too slow for the wind power. There is also "clean" coal. The reality is that we have no choice, and the more we spend time squabbling and appeasing some intellectually challenged people, the more we kill the earth.


Japan crisis hits global nuclear sector; may boost green power

Related Topics

Stocks

 
KEPCO Plant Service & Engineering Co Ltd
051600.KS
₩35,250.00
-6,100.00-14.75%
03/14/2011
 
Rio Tinto PLC
RIO.L
3,967.50p
+4.00+0.10%
10:39pm GMT+0800
 
Rio Tinto Ltd
RIO.AX
$79.15
+0.35+0.44%
03/14/2011
SINGAPORE/HONG KONG - | Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:37am EDT
(Reuters) - Switzerland put on hold some approvals for nuclear power plants and Germany cast doubts about its industry after the Japanese nuclear crisis, raising questions over the future of the global sector.
Taiwan's state-run Taipower also said it was studying plans to cut nuclear power output.
The crisis at the quake-hit Fukushima nuclear power complex north of Tokyo is likely to increase opposition to major nuclear expansion in Europe and hurt a renaissance for the sector in the United States, which already has more than 100 reactors.
Swiss Energy Minister Doris Leuthard suspended the approvals process for three nuclear power stations so safety standards can be revisited after the crisis in Japan.
However, the disaster might give renewables and greener fuels such as LNG sector a boost in the quest for safer energy.
The crippled Japanese plant, near the epicenter of Friday's 8.9 magnitude quake, suffered a second explosion on Monday. Of Japan's 54 reactors, 11 are shut down because of the quake.
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said on Monday that a government decision to extend the life of the country's nuclear power stations could be suspended following the crisis in Japan.
Senator Joe Lieberman, who chairs the Senate's homeland security panel, said on Sunday the United States should "put the brakes on" new nuclear power plants until the impact of the incident in Japan became clear.
Simon Powell, head of sustainable research at CLSA in Hong Kong said: "I don't think nuclear is going to be done away with but it is likely that people's nuclear programs will be delayed as they question whether it is the right thing to," he said.
An executive at state-run utility Korea Electric Power Corp (KEPCO) said: "The nuclear power industry is likely to shrink due to Japan's nuclear accident."
"Rising opposition is seen in developed countries, although developing countries may see less opposition due to their shortage of power unless they reside in earthquake zones," the executive said.
Asia's insatiable appetite for electricity is however unlikely to derail nuclear programs but would likely lead to a reassessment of safety procedures or designs and a further diversification of energy sources.
Globally, renewable energy such as wind power could benefit in the medium term.
BOOST FOR GREEN POWER
KGI Asia analyst Jennifer Liang said the nuclear incident had strengthened the case for safer sources of renewable energy. But she also pointed to the current limitations of green energy.